SCOTUS to Hear GOP Challenge That Could Shake Up Elections
SCOTUS to Hear GOP Challenge That Could Shake Up Elections
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up a Republican-led challenge to U.S. campaign finance restrictions that limit the amount of money that political parties can spend on behalf of certain candidates.
The case, National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, was originally appealed to the court by the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), and on behalf of two Senate Republican candidates running for election at the time — among them, now-Vice President JD Vance.
It centers on whether federal limits on campaign spending by political parties run afoul of free speech protections under the First Amendment of the Constitution.
In asking the Supreme Court to review the case, petitioners said the spending limits "severely restrict political party committees from doing what the First Amendment entitles them to do: fully associate with and advocate for their own candidates for federal office."
A decision from the Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority could have major implications on campaign spending in the U.S., further eroding the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, a law Congress passed more than 50 years ago with the aim of restricting the amount of money that can be spent on behalf of candidates.
The case comes as federal election spending has reached record highs: Presidential candidates in 2024 raised at least $2 billion and spent roughly $1.8 billion in 2024, according to FEC figures.
The challenge will almost certainly be among the most high-profile cases to be heard by the Supreme Court in the upcoming term.
The Trump-led Justice Department also said it will side with the NRSC in arguing the case, putting the administration in the somewhat unusual move of arguing against laws passed by Congress. The Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, meanwhile, have asked to defend the decision of a lower appeals court that ruled in 2024 to keep the limits in place.
The Justice Department cited free speech protections as its basis for siding with the NRSC, saying their decision to do so represents "the rare case that warrants an exception to that general approach" of backing federal laws."
Oral arguments will be held in the fall.
Trump to End Mail-In Ballots, Voting Machines
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
Texas Dems Return to Austin
Aug 18, 2025
1 min
Trump Offers Ukraine 'Article 5-Like' Protection
Aug 18, 2025
3 min
MSNBC to Change Name to MS NOW
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
ICE Arrests Illegal Migrant Influencer During Live Stream
Aug 18, 2025
1 min
Thousands Protest Migrant Hotels Across England
Aug 18, 2025
3 min
Bolivia Defeats Socialism for 1st Time in 20 Years
Aug 18, 2025
5 min
Israelis Hold Nationwide Protests to End Gaza War
Aug 18, 2025
3 min
EU Leaders to Join Zelensky in WH Meeting with Trump
Aug 18, 2025
4 min
NYC Restaurant Shooting: 3 Killed, 8 Wounded
Aug 18, 2025
4 min
VIDEO: Michigan Councilman Caught Stuffing Ballot Drop Box
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
NY Gov Pardons 13 Migrants, Including Manslaughter Convict
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
Judge Expands Paxton Restraining Order Against O'Rourke
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
Israeli Cyber Official Arrested in US Child Sex Sting
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
3 Republican States to Send National Guard Troops to DC
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
Read: Melania Trump’s Letter to Putin
Aug 18, 2025
2 min
Bush Family Eyes Maine Political Revival in Trump Era
Aug 18, 2025
3 min
National Guard to Start Carrying Weapons in DC
Aug 17, 2025
2 min
Denzel Washington Blasts Cancel Culture
Aug 17, 2025
1 min
NJ Parents Face Jail, Fines for Kids’ Crimes
Aug 17, 2025
2 min