The Frank
Home
Today's Fastrack
About
Subscribe
Judge Rules Trump's LA Troop Deployment Illegal

Judge Rules Trump's LA Troop Deployment Illegal

author
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com
The Frank Staff
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com

Sep 2, 2025

·

0 min read

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that National Guard troops ran afoul of the law in Los Angeles when President Trump deployed them in June after immigration protests that turned violent.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled their actions violated an 1878 law that generally bars federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement.

“This was intentional—Defendants instigated a months-long deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles for the purpose of establishing a military presence there and enforcing federal law. Such conduct is a serious violation of the Posse Comitatus Act,” Breyer wrote.

Though most of the troops are no longer deployed in the city, the judge’s order blocks any remaining ones from making arrests and searches or conducting traffic patrols and riot control until the government meets a valid legal exception.

Breyer paused his order until next Friday, providing the administration with an avenue to appeal before it goes into effect.

An appeals court blocked a previous Breyer order that found Trump illegally federalized the National Guard and must hand back control to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).

“The military will remain in Los Angeles. This is a false narrative and a misleading injunction,” acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli wrote on X.

“The military has never engaged in direct law enforcement operations here in LA,” he continued. “They protect our federal employees our properties so our federal agents can safely enforce federal laws in the face of the thugs being unleashed and encouraged by state and local politicians.”

Trump deployed several thousand National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines to Los Angeles in June as protests erupted in the city over the administration’s immigration crackdown, turning violent in some cases.

It sparked a major confrontation between Trump and Newsom, who has leaned into his role as a visible Trump foe to energize Democrats eager to see members of their party fight back at the president.

“DONALD TRUMP LOSES AGAIN,” Newsom responded to the ruling on X. “The courts agree — his militarization of our streets and use of the military against US citizens is ILLEGAL.”

Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) had said the deployment is illegal in several respects and demanded the courts intervene to send the troops home.

After they sued, Breyer quickly issued an emergency ruling in June finding Trump didn’t follow the mandated procedure.

The judge had ordered Trump return control of the National Guard to Newsom, but the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals halted the ruling until it resolves the administration’s appeal, allowing the deployment to remain.

As that appeal over Trump’s authority remains pending, Breyer moved ahead to consider the legality of the troops’ actions on the ground. Breyer, an appointee of former President Clinton, is the brother of retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.

During a three-day bench trial last month, the judge heard testimony from three Defense and immigration officials as the Trump administration insisted the troops’ actions complied with the Posse Comitatus Act.

Breyer’s ruling rejects the administration’s arguments that the law doesn’t apply to the Los Angeles deployment and Newsom had no right to sue.

The judge went on to declare the troops’ actions illegal, emphasizing many went beyond the vicinity of federal property in downtown Los Angeles to assist immigration raids.

“In fact, these violations were part of a top-down, systemic effort by Defendants to use military troops to execute various sectors of federal law (the drug laws and the immigration laws at least) across hundreds of miles and over the course of several months—and counting,” Breyer wrote.

The judge briefly noted Trump has since deployed the National Guard to Washington, D.C., and has threatened to do so in other Democrat-led cities.

But Tuesday’s ruling does not impact those moves, and the unique structure of D.C. and its National Guard raises additional legal questions.

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

Judge Bans ICE From Arresting MN Protesters

Jan 17, 2026

1 min

DOJ Probes Walz, Frey for Impeding ICE

Jan 17, 2026

1 min

Charles Wall Named ICE Deputy Director

Jan 17, 2026

2 min

Cohen: I Was Coerced to Frame Trump

Jan 17, 2026

3 min

Trump Unveils New Healthcare Affordability Plan

Jan 17, 2026

3 min

Mossad Chief in US for Iran Talks

Jan 17, 2026

2 min

Machado Gifts Trump Her Nobel Peace Prize

Jan 17, 2026

3 min

DOJ Launches Criminal Probe Into Jerome Powell

Jan 12, 2026

1 min

Report: Trump Orders Greenland Invasion Plans

Jan 12, 2026

2 min

Iran Death Toll Hits 500, 10K Arrested

Jan 12, 2026

3 min

Trump Weighs Potential Military Intervention in Iran

Jan 12, 2026

2 min

Judge Blocks Trump’s Mail-In Voting Restrictions

Jan 12, 2026

2 min

Fundraiser Raises $400k+ for ICE Officer Ross

Jan 12, 2026

3 min

Mississippi’s Largest Synagogue Destroyed in Arson Attack

Jan 12, 2026

3 min

Maduro Guard: US Used 'Sonic Weapon' in Raid

Jan 12, 2026

3 min

Iran on Brink of Collapse

Jan 11, 2026

5 min

1,000+ Anti-ICE Protests Planned Nationwide

Jan 11, 2026

2 min

Renee Good Was in 'ICE Watch' Group

Jan 11, 2026

4 min

Video Filmed by ICE Agent Who Shot Good Emerges

Jan 11, 2026

2 min

US Strikes ISIS Targets in Syria

Jan 11, 2026

<1 min

  • Today's Fastrack
  • About
  • Contact
  • Policy & Terms
  • Recaptcha