The Frank
Home
Today's Fastrack
About
Subscribe
Judge Extends Block on Portland Troop Deployment

Judge Extends Block on Portland Troop Deployment

author
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com
The Frank Staff
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com

Oct 16, 2025

·

0 min read

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

A federal judge in Oregon has extended temporary orders blocking President Trump from deploying the National Guard to patrol Portland as the president seeks to send troops into several Democratic-led cities.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut decided Wednesday to extend two temporary restraining orders she previously issued, which had been set to expire later this week, another 14 days.

The extension comes as a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit weighs whether to grant the Trump administration’s request to lift one of the orders keeping it from dispatching troops across the state.

Immergut, who was appointed to the bench by Trump during his first term, issued the back-to-back orders earlier this month.

She first ruled on Oct. 4 that the president could not federalize Oregon’s National Guard, and the next day, stopped him from sidestepping that order by calling in National Guard troops from other states to be deployed to Portland.

“This is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law,” she wrote in the first of the two orders.

Immergut also set a three-day bench trial for Oct. 29, to consider whether a longer block is warranted.

On Sept. 27, Trump directed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to provide troops to protect Portland and Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the city. Hegseth issued a memo authorizing deployment and federalization of 200 Oregon National Guard members the next day, over Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek’s (D) objection.

Oregon and Portland officials jointly sued the administration to block the deployment, contending the move runs afoul of federal law governing the use of military forces and steps on the state’s sovereignty.

The administration argued that courts must give a “great level of deference” to the president’s determination to federalize the National Guard, but Immergut ruled that that deference is not equivalent to “ignoring the facts on the ground.” She found that Trump’s perception of the state-of-play in Portland was “simply untethered to the facts.”

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

GOP Candidate Stabbed by Anti-ICE Mob

Jan 19, 2026

2 min

Pentagon Readies 1,500 Troops for Minnesota

Jan 19, 2026

1 min

Anti-ICE Mob Storms Minnesota Church

Jan 19, 2026

2 min

EU Calls Emergency Meeting Over Trump Tariffs

Jan 19, 2026

5 min

Spain: 39 Dead in High-Speed Train Crash

Jan 19, 2026

3 min

US Kills Al‑Qaeda Leader Linked to Syria Ambush

Jan 19, 2026

2 min

FBI Captures Top 10 Most Wanted Fugitive

Jan 19, 2026

2 min

Piers Morgan Hospitalized with Broken Hip

Jan 19, 2026

1 min

Judge Bans ICE From Arresting MN Protesters

Jan 17, 2026

1 min

DOJ Probes Walz, Frey for Impeding ICE

Jan 17, 2026

1 min

Charles Wall Named ICE Deputy Director

Jan 17, 2026

2 min

Cohen: I Was Coerced to Frame Trump

Jan 17, 2026

3 min

Trump Unveils New Healthcare Affordability Plan

Jan 17, 2026

3 min

Mossad Chief in US for Iran Talks

Jan 17, 2026

2 min

Machado Gifts Trump Her Nobel Peace Prize

Jan 17, 2026

3 min

DOJ Launches Criminal Probe Into Jerome Powell

Jan 12, 2026

1 min

Report: Trump Orders Greenland Invasion Plans

Jan 12, 2026

2 min

Iran Death Toll Hits 500, 10K Arrested

Jan 12, 2026

3 min

Trump Weighs Potential Military Intervention in Iran

Jan 12, 2026

2 min

Judge Blocks Trump’s Mail-In Voting Restrictions

Jan 12, 2026

2 min

  • Today's Fastrack
  • About
  • Contact
  • Policy & Terms
  • Recaptcha