The Frank
Home
Today's Fastrack
About
Subscribe
Judge Extends Block on Portland Troop Deployment

Judge Extends Block on Portland Troop Deployment

author
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com
The Frank Staff
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com

Oct 16, 2025

·

0 min read

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

A federal judge in Oregon has extended temporary orders blocking President Trump from deploying the National Guard to patrol Portland as the president seeks to send troops into several Democratic-led cities.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut decided Wednesday to extend two temporary restraining orders she previously issued, which had been set to expire later this week, another 14 days.

The extension comes as a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit weighs whether to grant the Trump administration’s request to lift one of the orders keeping it from dispatching troops across the state.

Immergut, who was appointed to the bench by Trump during his first term, issued the back-to-back orders earlier this month.

She first ruled on Oct. 4 that the president could not federalize Oregon’s National Guard, and the next day, stopped him from sidestepping that order by calling in National Guard troops from other states to be deployed to Portland.

“This is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law,” she wrote in the first of the two orders.

Immergut also set a three-day bench trial for Oct. 29, to consider whether a longer block is warranted.

On Sept. 27, Trump directed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to provide troops to protect Portland and Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the city. Hegseth issued a memo authorizing deployment and federalization of 200 Oregon National Guard members the next day, over Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek’s (D) objection.

Oregon and Portland officials jointly sued the administration to block the deployment, contending the move runs afoul of federal law governing the use of military forces and steps on the state’s sovereignty.

The administration argued that courts must give a “great level of deference” to the president’s determination to federalize the National Guard, but Immergut ruled that that deference is not equivalent to “ignoring the facts on the ground.” She found that Trump’s perception of the state-of-play in Portland was “simply untethered to the facts.”

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

Dem Wins Miami Mayor Race After 28 Years

Dec 10, 2025

2 min

Trump to Zelensky: Accept Peace Deal by Christmas

Dec 10, 2025

3 min

Ellison Wants to Turn CNN Into Fox Competitor

Dec 10, 2025

4 min

1 Killed, 1 Injured in Kentucky State University Shooting

Dec 10, 2025

1 min

Tony Dokoupil Named CBS Evening News Anchor

Dec 10, 2025

3 min

Appeals Court Upholds Trans Military Ban

Dec 10, 2025

3 min

Judge Will Release Maxwell Grand Jury Docs

Dec 10, 2025

1 min

Mamdani Crime Adviser is Convicted Robber

Dec 10, 2025

2 min

Report: Trump Considering Replacing Noem at DHS

Dec 8, 2025

1 min

Mamdani Gives Advice On How To Evade ICE

Dec 8, 2025

2 min

Russia Rapidly Gaining Territory in Ukraine

Dec 8, 2025

3 min

Black Man Acquitted of Stabbing White Man

Dec 8, 2025

2 min

Cinnabon Employee Fired for Calling Somali Couple N-Word

Dec 8, 2025

1 min

US Coast Guard Seizes 20K Pounds of Cocaine

Dec 8, 2025

2 min

Jaguar Designer Behind ‘Woke’ Rebrand Fired

Dec 8, 2025

2 min

EU Fines Musk’s X $140M

Dec 7, 2025

3 min

Gunman Opens Fire at Tim Pool’s Home

Dec 7, 2025

1 min

Judge Will Release Epstein Grand Jury Docs

Dec 7, 2025

1 min

Supreme Court to Hear Birthright Citizenship Case

Dec 7, 2025

4 min

Supreme Court Allows Texas to Use New Maps

Dec 7, 2025

7 min

  • Today's Fastrack
  • About
  • Contact
  • Policy & Terms
  • Recaptcha