The Frank
Home
Today's Fastrack
About
Subscribe
Supreme Court Allow Trans Military Ban

Supreme Court Allow Trans Military Ban

author
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com
The Frank Staff
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com

May 7, 2025

·

0 min read

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump to implement his ban on transgender people serving in the military.

The justices granted an emergency request from the Trump administration to lift a nationwide injunction blocking the policy while litigation continues.

The court's brief order noted that the three liberal justices dissented.

"No more trans @ DoD," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on X. In a separate Defense Department post earlier Tuesday, before the decision was issued, Hegseth said in a video: "No more dudes in dresses. We are done with that s---."

Just over 4,000 transgender people currently serve in the military, according to Defense Department data, though some activists put the figure much higher. There are around 2.1 million active service members in total.

Among those affected with be the seven individual transgender service members, led by lead plaintiff Emily Shilling, a Navy commander, who had sued to block it.

"Transgender service members have served this nation with courage, skill, and selflessness for years," Shilling said in a statement Tuesday. "We’ve flown combat missions, led sailors, commanded troops, and stood watch. We are not a theory. We are not a policy debate. We are real people, doing real jobs, in defense of a nation we still believe in, even when it struggles to believe in us."

"I know this decision will cause fear and doubt in the ranks. To those feeling shaken, I say this: stand tall. You are not alone. You are part of a community that will fight for you, stand beside you, and never stop pushing forward," she added.

Lambda Legal and the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, two groups representing the plaintiffs, said in a joint statement that the Supreme Court decision was a "devastating blow" to transgender service members.

The policy “has nothing to do with military readiness and everything to do with prejudice,” they added.

In a separate case, a judge in Washington, D.C., also blocked the policy nationwide, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit put that ruling on hold temporarily while it heard arguments on whether to block it more permanently. The court has yet to rule.

The policy, announced in February, is much more comprehensive ban than a similar proposal implemented during the first Trump term. It "generally disqualifies from military service individuals who have gender dysphoria or have undergone medical interventions for gender dysphoria," Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in court papers.

In asking the Supreme Court to intervene, Sauer said that judges are required to show "substantial deference" to the Defense Department's judgment on military issues.

In implementing the policy, the government relied on a Pentagon report from the first Trump term that said people with gender dysphoria are a threat to "military effectiveness and lethality."

The challengers argued in court that the ban violates the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which requires that laws apply equally to everybody, as well as other constitutional provisions.

Transgender service members have shown in recent years that they can serve just as well as anyone else, their lawyers said in court papers. Then-President Joe Biden had rolled back Trump's earlier restrictions.

"An unprecedented degree of animus towards transgender people animates and permeates the ban: it is based on the shocking proposition that transgender people do not exist," the lawyers wrote.

A federal judge in Washington state blocked the policy March 27, saying “it is not an especially close question.” The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to put the ruling on hold, prompting the Trump administration to turn to the Supreme Court.

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

Judge Allows IRS to Share Illegal Immigrants’ Tax Data with ICE

May 13, 2025

1 min

Diddy Trial Day 1: Male Escort Gives Graphic Testimony

May 13, 2025

6 min

House Panel Releases Sweeping GOP Tax Bill

May 13, 2025

4 min

US Welcomes First White South African 'Refugees'

May 13, 2025

2 min

Arrests Made After Protesters Clash With Police at Newark ICE Facility

May 13, 2025

3 min

Pope Leo XIV’s Brother Doubles Down on 'Drunk C*nt' Pelosi Post

May 13, 2025

2 min

US Rakes in Record $16B in Customs Duties in April from Trump Tariffs

May 13, 2025

1 min

Taliban Bans Chess in Afghanistan

May 13, 2025

1 min

US-China Trade War Paused with 90-Day Tariff Cuts

May 13, 2025

2 min

Emmanuel Macron 'Cocaine' Conspiracy Erupt After Kyiv Meeting

May 13, 2025

2 min

Meet Russell Vought: Trump Official Who Is Taking Over DOGE from Musk

May 13, 2025

3 min

Newark Airport Suffers Third System Outage in Less Than 2 Weeks

May 12, 2025

2 min

Republicans’ Partial Tax Plan to Cost $5 Trillion

May 12, 2025

2 min

Diddy Case in Danger as Key Witness Remains Awol on Eve of Trial Start

May 12, 2025

5 min

DHS Investigates California Program Giving Illegal Aliens Cash Assistance

May 12, 2025

2 min

White House Says Trade Deal Reached with China

May 12, 2025

4 min

Trump to Sign Executive Order to Cut Drug Prices by Up to 80%

May 12, 2025

2 min

Zelensky Agrees to Meet with Putin in Turkey on Thursday

May 12, 2025

2 min

Trump to Accept Luxury Jet from Qatar to Use as Air Force 1

May 12, 2025

4 min

Hamas to Release Israeli-American Hostage Edan Alexander

May 12, 2025

4 min

  • Today's Fastrack
  • About
  • Contact
  • Policy & Terms
  • Recaptcha