The Frank
Home
Today's Fastrack
About
Subscribe
Judge Rules Trump Unlawfully Fired Biden-Appointed Head of Special Counsel Office

Judge Rules Trump Unlawfully Fired Biden-Appointed Head of Special Counsel Office

author
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com
The Frank Staff
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com

Invalid Date

·

0 min read

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

A D.C.-based federal district judge ruled late Saturday evening that President Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Office of Special Counsel was unlawful, keeping him in his post. The Trump administration filed their notice of appeal shortly thereafter.

Hampton Dellinger, appointed by former President Joe Biden to head the Office of Special Counsel, sued the Trump administration in Washington, D.C., federal court after his Feb. 7 firing.

D.C. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote in the Saturday filing that the court's ruling that Dellinger's firing was "unlawful" is consistent with Supreme Court precedent.

The Trump administration filed its notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shortly after Jackson's ruling.

Jackson wrote that the court "finds that the elimination of the restrictions on plaintiff’s removal would be fatal to the defining and essential feature of the Office of Special Counsel as it was conceived by Congress and signed into law by the President: its independence. The Court concludes that they must stand."

Jackson enjoined the defendants in the suit, including Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget Russ Vought and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, ordering them to recognize Dellinger's post. Jackson did not enjoin Trump.

"It would be ironic, to say the least, and inimical to the ends furthered by the statute if the Special Counsel himself could be chilled in his work by fear of arbitrary or partisan removal," Jackson wrote.

Jackson wrote in her order that the enjoined defendants "must not obstruct or interfere with his performance of his duties; they must not deny him the authority, benefits, or resources of his office; they must not recognize any Acting Special Counsel in his place; and they must not treat him in any way as if he has been removed, or recognize any other person as Special Counsel or as the head of the Office of Special Counsel, unless and until he is removed from office" in accordance with the statute delineating Dellinger's post.

Jackson's decision comes after the U.S. Supreme Court paused the Trump administration's efforts to dismiss Dellinger. The Trump administration had asked the high court to overturn a lower court's temporary reinstatement of Dellinger.

The dispute over Dellinger's firing was the first Trump legal challenge to reach the Supreme Court in his second term.

Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito dissented, saying the lower court overstepped, and they cast doubt on whether courts have the authority to restore to office someone the president has fired. While acknowledging that some officials appointed by the president have contested their removal, Gorsuch wrote in his opinion that "those officials have generally sought remedies like backpay, not injunctive relief like reinstatement."

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson notably voted to outright deny the administration’s request to OK the firing at the time.

Shortly after the Supreme Court paused Trump's efforts, Jackson hinted that she would possibly extend a temporary restraining order which has kept Dellinger in his job.

Jackson called the matter "an extraordinarily difficult constitutional issue" during a hearing.

"I am glad to be able to continue my work as an independent government watchdog and whistleblower advocate," Dellinger said in a statement at the time. "I am grateful to the judges and justices who have concluded that I should be allowed to remain on the job while the courts decide whether my office can retain a measure of independence from direct partisan and political control."

Dellinger has maintained the argument that, by law, he can only be dismissed from his position for job performance problems, which were not cited in an email dismissing him from his post.

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

Leo XIV Is the New Pope

May 8, 2025

5 min

Trump Considers Jeanine Pirro to Replace Ed Martin as Top DC Prosecutor

May 8, 2025

2 min

FBI Opens Criminal Investigation of Letitia James

May 8, 2025

2 min

Texas AG Paxton Announces Vote Fraud Charges Against 6 People

May 8, 2025

1 min

Trump Announces Trade Deal with UK

May 8, 2025

1 min

Pakistan ‘Kills’ 50 Indian Soldiers in Retaliation Strikes

May 8, 2025

4 min

Bill Gates Accuses Elon Musk of ‘Killing’ Children with USAID Cuts

May 8, 2025

3 min

Trump Plans Executive Order to Slash Drug Prices

May 8, 2025

2 min

Trump to Announce Trade Deal with UK Thursday

May 8, 2025

3 min

Trump to Remove Biden-Era Chip Export Restrictions

May 8, 2025

3 min

Pro-Palestinian Protesters Take Over Columbia University Library — 80+ Arrested

May 8, 2025

5 min

Iranian Terror Cell Plotted Attack on Israeli Embassy in London

May 8, 2025

3 min

Putin and Maduro Sign Strategic Partnership Treaty in Moscow

May 8, 2025

<1 min

Ex-Porn Star Who Claimed He’s Diddy’s Sex Slave Signed $5M NDA

May 8, 2025

4 min

AG Bondi: Tens of Thousands of Videos of Epstein with Children, Child Porn

May 7, 2025

2 min

FBI Arrests 200+ Child Sex Predators

May 7, 2025

2 min

Pakistan Authorizes Military Response After India Strikes

May 7, 2025

5 min

Fed Holds Rates Steady — Warns of Stagflation

May 7, 2025

3 min

2nd Navy Jet Falls Into Red Sea from Truman Aircraft Carrier

May 7, 2025

3 min

Black Smoke Over Vatican Signal No Pope Elected on 1st Day

May 7, 2025

4 min

  • Today's Fastrack
  • About
  • Contact
  • Policy & Terms
  • Recaptcha