The Frank
Home
Today's Fastrack
About
Subscribe
Judge Rejects Dem-Led Effort to Block DOGE

Judge Rejects Dem-Led Effort to Block DOGE

author
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com
The Frank Staff
author

The Frank Staff

The Frank Staff.
[email protected]
@TheFrank_com

Invalid Date

·

0 min read

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

THE NEWS

A federal judge rejected an urgent attempt by 14 states to bar Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing federal data systems and firing agency staff.

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled the plaintiffs failed to prove “imminent, irreparable harm” in Musk’s role overseeing DOGE’s sweeping government cuts.

The decision deals a legal victory to the Trump administration, which has defended Musk’s status as a mere advisor rather than a formal government official requiring Senate confirmation.

TIMELINE

  • Last Week: New Mexico and 13 other Democratic-led states file suit against Musk and DOGE, seeking a temporary restraining order (TRO).
  • Monday: The White House clarifies Musk’s role as a “non-career Special Government Employee,” disputing claims he leads DOGE.
  • Tuesday (Court Decision):
  • Judge Chutkan denies the TRO, citing insufficient evidence of “imminent, irreparable harm.”
  • Plaintiffs are invited to propose a briefing schedule if they wish to pursue a preliminary injunction.

REACTIONS

  • Judge Tanya Chutkan (US District Court): Emphasizes the need for “clear evidence” of harm and questions the plaintiffs’ broad request to halt DOGE’s access to sensitive systems.
  • Elon Musk (DOGE Advisor): On X (formerly Twitter), defends DOGE’s mission: “We just want to fix waste and fraud… The scrutiny on me is extreme, so it’s not like I could ‘get away’ with something.”
  • New Mexico AG Raul Torez (Lead Plaintiff): Warns that DOGE plans mass firings at critical civil rights and anti-discrimination offices across multiple federal agencies.

WHAT’S NEXT

Chutkan on Tuesday ordered the parties in the lawsuit to confer regarding further proceedings. She said that if the plaintiffs want to request a preliminary injunction, they should file a proposed briefing schedule by 5 p.m. on Wednesday.

Share options

Email
Facebook
X
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit

Leo XIV Is the New Pope

May 8, 2025

5 min

Trump Considers Jeanine Pirro to Replace Ed Martin as Top DC Prosecutor

May 8, 2025

2 min

FBI Opens Criminal Investigation of Letitia James

May 8, 2025

2 min

Texas AG Paxton Announces Vote Fraud Charges Against 6 People

May 8, 2025

1 min

Trump Announces Trade Deal with UK

May 8, 2025

1 min

Pakistan ‘Kills’ 50 Indian Soldiers in Retaliation Strikes

May 8, 2025

4 min

Bill Gates Accuses Elon Musk of ‘Killing’ Children with USAID Cuts

May 8, 2025

3 min

Trump Plans Executive Order to Slash Drug Prices

May 8, 2025

2 min

Trump to Announce Trade Deal with UK Thursday

May 8, 2025

3 min

Trump to Remove Biden-Era Chip Export Restrictions

May 8, 2025

3 min

Pro-Palestinian Protesters Take Over Columbia University Library — 80+ Arrested

May 8, 2025

5 min

Iranian Terror Cell Plotted Attack on Israeli Embassy in London

May 8, 2025

3 min

Putin and Maduro Sign Strategic Partnership Treaty in Moscow

May 8, 2025

<1 min

Ex-Porn Star Who Claimed He’s Diddy’s Sex Slave Signed $5M NDA

May 8, 2025

4 min

AG Bondi: Tens of Thousands of Videos of Epstein with Children, Child Porn

May 7, 2025

2 min

FBI Arrests 200+ Child Sex Predators

May 7, 2025

2 min

Pakistan Authorizes Military Response After India Strikes

May 7, 2025

5 min

Fed Holds Rates Steady — Warns of Stagflation

May 7, 2025

3 min

2nd Navy Jet Falls Into Red Sea from Truman Aircraft Carrier

May 7, 2025

3 min

Black Smoke Over Vatican Signal No Pope Elected on 1st Day

May 7, 2025

4 min

  • Today's Fastrack
  • About
  • Contact
  • Policy & Terms
  • Recaptcha